Luck v Deakin University [2009] FCA 1032

Luck v Deakin University [2009] FCA 1032

Deakin University is not subject to the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) as it is not an 'agency' within the statutory definition. The Higher Education Support Act 2003 (Cth) does not extend privacy obligations to the respondent in respect of the applicant's student record, as the information was not gathered for the relevant statutory purposes. Therefore, there is no legal basis to grant the injunctions sought.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 September 2009
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['injunctions' 'privacy' 'access to Information' 'higher Education Support Act' 'meaning of Personal Information']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion

  1. 1 ["Whether Deakin University is bound by the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) in respect of the applicant's student record" "Whether the student record is 'personal information' for the purposes of the Higher Education Support Act 2003 (Cth)" 'Whether an injunction should issue requiring Deakin University to provide the applicant access to her student record']

Ratio Decidendi

Deakin University is not subject to the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) as it is not an 'agency' within the statutory definition. The Higher Education Support Act 2003 (Cth) does not extend privacy obligations to the respondent in respect of the applicant's student record, as the information was not gathered for the relevant statutory purposes. Therefore, there is no legal basis to grant the injunctions sought.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ["The applicant's notice of motion dated 21 July 2009 is dismissed." "The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the motion, to be taxed in default of agreement."]