Regina v GCT [1999] NSWCCA 228
The sentencing judge erred in characterising the level of criminality and failed to expressly consider s 442B and special circumstances under s 5 of the Sentencing Act 1989. Leave to appeal is granted, the original sentences are quashed, and an adjusted sentence of three years penal servitude is imposed, with minimum and additional terms reflecting assistance to police and special circumstances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 August 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; sentences quashed and re-sentenced.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'assistance to Police' 'armed With Intent to Rob' 'special Circumstances']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in characterising the level of criminality' 'Whether the sentencing judge failed to properly apply s 442B of the Crimes Act regarding assistance to police' 'Whether special circumstances under s 5 of the Sentencing Act 1989 should have been considered']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred in characterising the level of criminality and failed to expressly consider s 442B and special circumstances under s 5 of the Sentencing Act 1989. Leave to appeal is granted, the original sentences are quashed, and an adjusted sentence of three years penal servitude is imposed, with minimum and additional terms reflecting assistance to police and special circumstances.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; sentences quashed and re-sentenced.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal allowed.' 'Original sentences quashed.' 'Overall sentence of three years penal servitude imposed.' 'Minimum term of eighteen months from 1 May 1998 to 31 October 1999.' 'Additional term of eighteen months from 1 November 1999 to 30 April 2001.' 'Material in the envelope to be...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment