GDO v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2024] NSWCATAP 260
No question of law was raised and no ground was established for leave to appeal; the appeal lacked utility as the sale contract for the property had been completed; the reviewable decision did not deal with the application of sale proceeds, rendering the main ground irrelevant; the appeal was dismissed and leave to appeal refused.
- Parties
- Appellant: GDO; First Respondent: NSW Trustee and Guardian; Second Respondent: GKV; Third Respondent: GKZ
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Appeal and Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Administrative Review, Financial Management Orders, Non Publication Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GDO
Appellant
NSW Trustee and Guardian
First Respondent
GKV
Second Respondent
GKZ
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal and Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether any question of law is raised justifying the grant of leave to appeal
- 2 Whether there are grounds for leave to appeal against the decision affirming the sale of property by NSW Trustee and Guardian
- 3 Whether the appeal has utility in the circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
No question of law was raised and no ground was established for leave to appeal; the appeal lacked utility as the sale contract for the property had been completed; the reviewable decision did not deal with the application of sale proceeds, rendering the main ground irrelevant; the appeal was dismissed and leave to appeal refused.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- Leave to appeal is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment