GE CAPITAL AUSTRALIA v DAVIS & ORS [2002] NSWSC 1146

GE CAPITAL AUSTRALIA v DAVIS & ORS [2002] NSWSC 1146

The guarantee is enforceable against the defendants. The charges over partnership property were valid and effective, as both partners consented. There was no breach of s.420A; the auction sale achieved the best price reasonably obtainable in the circumstances. No statutory, equitable, or tort remedies are available to guarantors in this context. Cross-claims and equitable set-off, as well as claims under the Contracts Review Act, fail due to guarantee contract terms and lack of factual basis for relief.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 November 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for plaintiff, cross-claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
['guarantee' 'security Interests' 'corporations Act S.420 A' 'contracts Review Act' 'sale of Secured Property' 'remedies for Breach of Statutory Duty' 'equitable Set Off']
['commercial Law' 'equity'] ['guarantee' 'security Interests' 'corporations Act S.420 A' 'contracts Review Act' 'sale of Secured Property' 'remedies for Breach of Statutory Duty' 'equitable Set Off']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Were the securities valid and effective?' 'Did the plaintiff breach s.420A of the Corporations Act by failing to obtain market value or best price?' 'Do guarantors have remedies under s.420A, s.423, s.1324 of Corporations Act or in tort?' 'Can cross-claims, set-off or equitable defence be raised against guarantee liability?' 'Should the guarantee be set aside under Contracts Review Act?']

Ratio Decidendi

The guarantee is enforceable against the defendants. The charges over partnership property were valid and effective, as both partners consented. There was no breach of s.420A; the auction sale achieved the best price reasonably obtainable in the circumstances. No statutory, equitable, or tort remedies are available to guarantors in this context. Cross-claims and equitable set-off, as well as claims under the Contracts Review Act, fail due to guarantee contract terms and lack of factual basis for relief.

Court Disposition

Judgment for plaintiff, cross-claim dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Cross-claim dismissed.' 'Judgment for Plaintiff (exact amount to be calculated including interest).']