GEBHARD v COAL AND ALLIED OPERATIONS PTY LTD; WILLIAMS v COAL AND ALLIED OPERATIONS PTY LTD [1994] NSWCA 46
The interests of justice require an adjournment, as there is no prejudice to the respondent and the applicants may benefit from forthcoming High Court pronouncements.
- Parties
- Applicant: Gebhard; Applicant: Williams; Respondent: Coal & Allied Operations Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Adjournment of Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- adjourned
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Gebhard
Applicant
Williams
Applicant
Coal & Allied Operations Pty Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Adjournment of Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to adjourn the applications for leave to appeal pending High Court special leave applications in related cases
Ratio Decidendi
The interests of justice require an adjournment, as there is no prejudice to the respondent and the applicants may benefit from forthcoming High Court pronouncements.
Court Disposition
adjourned
Orders
- Applications adjourned to 2 May.
- Question of costs reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment