Gelder Architects v Ku-ring-gai Council [2016] NSWLEC 1223
The Court, being satisfied that the conciliation agreement met legislative requirements, made orders reflecting the agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Gelder Architects; Respondent: Ku-ring-gai Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Orders Post Agreement
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions; costs orders made.
- Legal Topics
- Conciliation Conference, Agreement Between Parties, Development Application, Court Orders
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gelder Architects
Applicant
Ku-ring-gai Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Orders Post Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conciliation agreement satisfied s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- 2 Whether the agreement could be disposed of by court order
Ratio Decidendi
The Court, being satisfied that the conciliation agreement met legislative requirements, made orders reflecting the agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions; costs orders made.
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application and rely on the amended plans referred to in Condition 1 of Annexure "A".
- The Appeal is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment