Gemaveld Pty Limited v Georges River Council [2022] NSWLEC 1182
As the agreement between the parties is one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, including compliance with all applicable planning instruments and legislative requirements, the Court upholds the appeal and grants consent subject to specified conditions.
- Parties
- Applicant: Gemaveld Pty Limited; Respondent: Georges River Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Judgment on S 34 Agreement Following Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to specified conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Section 34 Agreement, Conciliation Conference, Conditional Development Consent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gemaveld Pty Limited
Applicant
Georges River Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Judgment on S 34 Agreement Following Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed development complies with relevant planning controls
- 2 Whether consent should be granted under s 4.16 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
- 3 Whether jurisdictional prerequisites for the Court to exercise its functions are satisfied in light of the parties’ agreement
Ratio Decidendi
As the agreement between the parties is one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, including compliance with all applicable planning instruments and legislative requirements, the Court upholds the appeal and grants consent subject to specified conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to specified conditions.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development Application No DA 2020/0247, as amended, is determined by the grant of consent, subject to conditions set out in Annexure 'B'.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment