Carroll -v- Zielke & ors [2001] NSWADT 146

Carroll -v- Zielke & ors [2001] NSWADT 146

The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that Mr Zielke and Mr Favell each engaged in unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature towards Ms Carroll in circumstances where a reasonable person would have anticipated Ms Carroll would be offended, humiliated, or intimidated, constituting unlawful sexual harassment under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977. The employer, Zielke Investments, was also liable as it failed to take reasonable steps to prevent such conduct. Damages were apportioned 20/80 between Mr Favell and Mr Zielke, with the employer jointly and severally liable.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 September 2001
Procedural Posture
Sexual Harassment Complaint / Decision
Outcome
complaint substantiated in favour of applicant
Legal Topics
['sexual Harassment' 'workplace Discrimination' 'employer Liability']
['anti Discrimination Law' 'employment Law'] ['sexual Harassment' 'workplace Discrimination' 'employer Liability']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Sexual Harassment Complaint / Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Ms Carroll was sexually harassed by Mr Zielke and/or Mr Favell in contravention of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977' 'Whether the employer, Zielke Investments, is liable for the conduct of its employees under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977' 'Assessment and apportionment of damages']

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that Mr Zielke and Mr Favell each engaged in unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature towards Ms Carroll in circumstances where a reasonable person would have anticipated Ms Carroll would be offended, humiliated, or intimidated, constituting unlawful sexual harassment under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977. The employer, Zielke Investments, was also liable as it failed to take reasonable steps to prevent such conduct. Damages were apportioned 20/80 between Mr Favell and Mr Zielke, with the employer jointly and severally liable.

Court Disposition

complaint substantiated in favour of applicant

Orders

  • ['The respondents Nicholas Favell and Zielke Investments are ordered jointly and severally to pay the applicant Gemma Carroll the sum of $2934 by way of compensation for loss and damages.' 'The respondents Wayne Zielke and Zielke Investments are ordered jointly and severally to pay the applicant Gemma Carroll the...