Gene Hadjiangeli v Sutherland Shire Council [2016] NSWLEC 1635
The proceedings were disposed by making orders in accordance with the agreement reached between the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, with no merit assessment required from the Court.
- Parties
- Applicant: Gene Hadjiangeli; Respondent: Sutherland Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 / Post Conciliation Conference Orders
- Outcome
- appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Conciliation Conference, Consent Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Gene Hadjiangeli
Applicant
Sutherland Shire Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 / Post Conciliation Conference Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether agreement reached at conciliation conference under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 is capable of disposing proceedings
- 2 Whether the Court should make consent orders as agreed by the parties
Ratio Decidendi
The proceedings were disposed by making orders in accordance with the agreement reached between the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, with no merit assessment required from the Court.
Court Disposition
appeal upheld
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans referred to in Condition 1 of Annexure 'A'.
- The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs thrown away for the purpose of section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, in the amount of $4,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment