Godman v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 331
The application was dismissed because the applicant identified no grounds of review, made no submissions, and the Court, after reviewing the materials, found no reviewable error in the Tribunal's decision. The Tribunal's finding that the applicant had fabricated his claims was open on the material before it.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Concerning a Protection Visa / Final Judgment on Application Under S 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (cth)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visas' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'credibility Findings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Concerning a Protection Visa / Final Judgment on Application Under S 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (cth)
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant identified any grounds of review of the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision under s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)." "Whether the Tribunal's adverse credibility findings and conclusion that the applicant was not a refugee disclosed any reviewable error."]
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because the applicant identified no grounds of review, made no submissions, and the Court, after reviewing the materials, found no reviewable error in the Tribunal's decision. The Tribunal's finding that the applicant had fabricated his claims was open on the material before it.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment