Labara v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 652
The Tribunal was entitled to rely on independent country information and did not err in failing to be satisfied that Ukrainian authorities were unwilling or unable to protect the applicants from religiously motivated harm; no jurisdictional error or error of law was established under s 476(1).
- Parties
- Applicant: Gennadiy Labara; Applicant: Marina Bilousova; Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 April 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Protection Visas, Refugee Status, Judicial Review of Tribunal Decision
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gennadiy Labara
Applicant
Marina Bilousova
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal erred in affirming refusal of protection visas
- 2 Whether there was evidence or material to justify the Tribunal's decision regarding Ukraine's willingness or ability to protect against religious persecution
- 3 Application of s 476(1)(g) Migration Act 1958
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was entitled to rely on independent country information and did not err in failing to be satisfied that Ukrainian authorities were unwilling or unable to protect the applicants from religiously motivated harm; no jurisdictional error or error of law was established under s 476(1).
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application be dismissed.
- The applicants, Gennadiy Labara and Marina Bilousova, pay the costs of the respondent, Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment