WorkCover Authority of NSW (Insp Guillarte) v Genner Constructions Pty Ltd [2000] NSWIRComm 87
Although there was a proper safe system of work in place, Genner Constructions Pty Ltd breached its absolute duty by failing to properly train and instruct its worker about vehicular access and egress and about authority to alter site procedures. The risk of injury was foreseeable and preventable by appropriate training and instruction, making s10 relief inappropriate. Mitigating factors, including no prior convictions, a good industrial record, contrition, and comprehensive post-incident safety improvements, reduced the penalty. Because the two proven charges arose from the same incident, the totality principle required a total fine of $65,000 rather than two separate $40,000 fines.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 June 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Prosecution Under S 15(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 / Judgment as to Penalty After Prior Liability Judgment in Which Two Charges Were Found Proven and Three Charges Dismissed
- Outcome
- Defendant found guilty on both proven summonses; s10 application rejected; total fine imposed with costs to the prosecutor.
- Legal Topics
- ['penalty for Breach of Employer Duty Under S 15(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983' 'training and Instruction of Workers' 'safe System of Work' 'application of S10 Crimes (sentencing Procedure) Act 1999' 'totality Principle']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Prosecution Under S 15(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 / Judgment as to Penalty After Prior Liability Judgment in Which Two Charges Were Found Proven and Three Charges Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What penalty should be imposed for two proven breaches of s 15(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 arising from lack of training and instruction as to vehicular access and egress from a worksite.' 'Whether the circumstances justified an order under s10 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 without recording a conviction.' 'How the principle of totality should be applied to two charges arising out of the same incident.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although there was a proper safe system of work in place, Genner Constructions Pty Ltd breached its absolute duty by failing to properly train and instruct its worker about vehicular access and egress and about authority to alter site procedures. The risk of injury was foreseeable and preventable by appropriate training and instruction, making s10 relief inappropriate. Mitigating factors, including no prior convictions, a good industrial record, contrition, and comprehensive post-incident safety improvements, reduced the penalty. Because the two proven charges arose from the same incident, the totality principle required a total fine of $65,000 rather than two separate $40,000 fines.
Court Disposition
Defendant found guilty on both proven summonses; s10 application rejected; total fine imposed with costs to the prosecutor.
Orders
- ['In summons No IRC4898 of 1998 the defendant is found guilty.' 'In summons No IRC4900 of 1998 the defendant is found guilty.' 'In summons No IRC4898 of 1998 the defendant is fined $40,000.' 'In summons No IRC4890 of 1998 the defendant is fined $40,000.' 'In application of the principle of totality the defendant is...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment