Geoff Penney (NSW) Pty Ltd v. Skyjack Computer & Office Supplies [1987] FCA 512

Geoff Penney (NSW) Pty Ltd v. Skyjack Computer & Office Supplies [1987] FCA 512

The overall similarity between the get-up of the Artline 70 and Superline 70, including the creamy yellow barrel, bold red number 70, wavy coloured stripes and broadly similar cap and nib holder, gave Penney a strong case that consumers could be misled into believing there was an affiliation between the products,...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 September 1987
Procedural Posture
Trade Practices Misleading or Deceptive Conduct and Passing Off Proceeding Concerning Interlocutory Injunctive Relief / Application for Interlocutory Injunction
Outcome
Interlocutory injunction granted against the first respondent, with costs of the interlocutory claim reserved.
Legal Topics
['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'similar Get Up of Marker Pens' 'balance of Convenience' 'public Interest in Interlocutory Relief' 'goodwill']
['trade Practices' 'consumer Protection' 'passing Off' 'interlocutory Injunctions'] ['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'similar Get Up of Marker Pens' 'balance of Convenience' 'public Interest in Interlocutory Relief' 'goodwill']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Trade Practices Misleading or Deceptive Conduct and Passing Off Proceeding Concerning Interlocutory Injunctive Relief / Application for Interlocutory Injunction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether there was a serious question to be tried that Skyjack contravened s.52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 by selling or supplying the Superline 70 marker pen.' 'Whether the similarity in get-up between the Superline 70 and the Artline 70 could mislead consumers into believing there was an affiliation between the products.' 'Whether the balance of convenience and public interest justified interlocutory injunctive relief.']

Ratio Decidendi

The overall similarity between the get-up of the Artline 70 and Superline 70, including the creamy yellow barrel, bold red number 70, wavy coloured stripes and broadly similar cap and nib holder, gave Penney a strong case that consumers could be misled into believing there was an affiliation between the products, contrary to s.52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974. The potential erosion of Artline goodwill, the difficulty of assessing such damage, the strength of Penney's case, and the public interest in protecting consumers outweighed the inconvenience and expense to Skyjack, so interlocutory relief was appropriate.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory injunction granted against the first respondent, with costs of the interlocutory claim reserved.

Orders

  • ['Upon the applicant undertaking to pay to any party adversely affected by the interlocutory injunction such compensation, if any, as the Court thinks just in such manner as the Court directs, the first respondent is restrained by itself, its servants or agents from 12 noon on Monday 7 September 1987 until the...