BULMER v PORT STEPHENS COUNCIL [2007] NSWDC 205
The evidence was insufficient to establish the precise circumstances of the accident or any negligence by the council; no danger was known or reasonably foreseeable, so liability fails.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ex Tempore Judgment; Stood Over for Mention and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Claim against Port Stephens Council fails. Cross claim dismissed. Orders stood over for mention and final orders.
- Legal Topics
- ['occupiers Liability' 'foreseeable Risk' 'negligence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ex Tempore Judgment; Stood Over for Mention and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Precisely how the tables came to collapse on Mr Bulmer's leg" 'Whether those circumstances were the result of neglect on the part of the council' "If so, whether the whole or any part of the council's liability was the result of neglect on the part of the club" 'Extent of injury and ongoing disability for purpose of compensation']
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence was insufficient to establish the precise circumstances of the accident or any negligence by the council; no danger was known or reasonably foreseeable, so liability fails.
Court Disposition
Claim against Port Stephens Council fails. Cross claim dismissed. Orders stood over for mention and final orders.
Orders
- ['Stood over to 3 October 2007 at 9.30am for mention to appoint a date to deal with the costs issues and the making of final orders']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment