Baker v David [2015] NSWCA 235
The primary judge erred by not addressing the enforceability and construction of the 2004 agreement which was not hopeless; this amounted to an error of law and a substantial miscarriage of justice, warranting the orders being set aside and the proceedings remitted for a new trial.
- Parties
- Appellant: Geoffrey Charles Baker; Respondent: Bernard David
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal Disposition
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Orders set aside; Proceedings remitted for new trial; Further procedural orders and directions issued.
- Legal Topics
- Trustees for Sale, Exclusive Possession, Contractual Rights, Enforceability of Agreement, Construction of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Geoffrey Charles Baker
Appellant
Bernard David
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Disposition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether order appointing trustees for sale under s 66G of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) would be inconsistent with contractual right to exclusive possession
- 2 Whether primary judge addressed arguments made as to enforceability and construction of contract
Ratio Decidendi
The primary judge erred by not addressing the enforceability and construction of the 2004 agreement which was not hopeless; this amounted to an error of law and a substantial miscarriage of justice, warranting the orders being set aside and the proceedings remitted for a new trial.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Orders set aside; Proceedings remitted for new trial; Further procedural orders and directions issued.
Orders
- Appeal allowed.
- Set aside the orders made on 1 April 2015 and entered on 2 April 2015.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment