James v Andrews [2001] NSWSC 1149

James v Andrews [2001] NSWSC 1149

A person who is a director of a New South Wales-incorporated company is liable under Corporations Law s 588G and s 588M for failing to prevent insolvent trading, irrespective of that director’s physical presence outside the State, since the statutory obligation attaches to their office and acts or omissions with sufficient connection to NSW, giving the court jurisdiction and validating the legislative power.

Parties
Plaintiff: Geoffrey James; Plaintiff: Cowra Processors Pty Ltd (In liq); Defendant: Denis Andrews; Defendant: Brian Kelly; Defendant: Mt Erin Pacific (NZ) Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 December 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extra Territorial Operation, Insolvent Trading, Personal Liability of Directors, Jurisdiction of NSW Courts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Geoffrey James

Plaintiff

Cowra Processors Pty Ltd (In liq)

Plaintiff

Denis Andrews

Defendant

Brian Kelly

Defendant

Mt Erin Pacific (NZ) Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether NSW courts have jurisdiction to hear a claim against an overseas director for insolvent trading under Corporations Law s 588G and s 588M
  2. 2 Whether NSW Parliament is competent to legislate liability for non-resident directors in respect of a NSW company

Ratio Decidendi

A person who is a director of a New South Wales-incorporated company is liable under Corporations Law s 588G and s 588M for failing to prevent insolvent trading, irrespective of that director’s physical presence outside the State, since the statutory obligation attaches to their office and acts or omissions with sufficient connection to NSW, giving the court jurisdiction and validating the legislative power.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.
  • Time for filing notice of motion for leave to appeal extended to 15 February 2002.