Conlon v Public Trustee and anor [2002] NSWSC 153

Conlon v Public Trustee and anor [2002] NSWSC 153

The plaintiff was a member of a household of which the deceased was a member and was partially financially dependent; the provision made for him was inadequate considering his financial needs, the size and nature of the estate, and the relative provision made for his sister. Therefore, further provision should be made for the plaintiff from the estate by way of a legacy calculated according to the orders indicated.

Parties
Plaintiff: Geoffrey Kershaw Conlon; 1st Defendant: Public Trustee; 2nd Defendant: Christine Joan Conlon
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 March 2002
Procedural Posture
Application Under the Family Provision Act 1982 (nsw) / Judgment
Outcome
Application successful; further provision ordered in favour of the plaintiff, with costs to be paid out of the estate.
Legal Topics
Family Provision, Adequate Provision for Maintenance, Eligibility Under Family Provision Act
Succession Law Equity Family Provision Adequate Provision for Maintenance Eligibility Under Family Provision Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 17
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Geoffrey Kershaw Conlon

Plaintiff

Public Trustee

1st Defendant

Christine Joan Conlon

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application Under the Family Provision Act 1982 (nsw) / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff, as an adult brother and member of the deceased's household, is an eligible person for provision from the estate under the Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW)
  2. 2 Whether the provision made for the plaintiff by the deceased was adequate for his proper maintenance and advancement in life
  3. 3 Whether additional provision should be made for the plaintiff from the estate

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff was a member of a household of which the deceased was a member and was partially financially dependent; the provision made for him was inadequate considering his financial needs, the size and nature of the estate, and the relative provision made for his sister. Therefore, further provision should be made for the plaintiff from the estate by way of a legacy calculated according to the orders indicated.

Court Disposition

Application successful; further provision ordered in favour of the plaintiff, with costs to be paid out of the estate.

Orders

  • In lieu of the plaintiff's interest under the will, he is to receive a legacy equal to half of the sum of the residuary estate and $250,000 (the value of the succession to Ms Conlon), less $18,630 by way of set-off.
  • No interest on the legacy until one year after completion of the sale of the Rhodes property.