Garrett v Freeman (No. 3) [2007] NSWLEC 139
The remarks made by the judge describing the defendant's responses to statutory notices as misleading did not amount to apprehension of bias; a fair-minded observer would not reasonably conclude the judge could not decide the case impartially. The defendant's conduct and delay in raising the objection amounted to waiver. The application for disqualification was dismissed, and the hearing would continue.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution / Interlocutory Application (notice of Motion for Judicial Disqualification)
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['apprehension of Bias' 'judicial Disqualification' 'statutory Notice Compliance' 'misleading Answers' 'environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' 'national Parks and Wildlife Act 1974' 'protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Interlocutory Application (notice of Motion for Judicial Disqualification)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether adverse remarks and findings by the trial judge amount to apprehension of bias warranting disqualification' "Whether the defendant's responses to statutory notices were misleading" 'Whether the objection to alleged bias was waived through delay']
Ratio Decidendi
The remarks made by the judge describing the defendant's responses to statutory notices as misleading did not amount to apprehension of bias; a fair-minded observer would not reasonably conclude the judge could not decide the case impartially. The defendant's conduct and delay in raising the objection amounted to waiver. The application for disqualification was dismissed, and the hearing would continue.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- ["The defendant's notice of motion for judicial disqualification is dismissed." 'The hearing will continue.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment