Geoghegan v Stankovich [2008] NSWDC 289
There was no sufficient basis to imply a contractual term requiring reasonable steps to obtain subdivision, given the uncertainty and lack of evidence; thus, Mr and Mrs Stankovich did not breach the deed, and Mr Geoghegan was entitled to withdraw from the agreement under clause 8 and claim repayment of mortgage sums he paid plus 20%.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Geoghegan; Defendant: Stankovich
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiff in part, directions given for final orders
- Legal Topics
- General Contractual Principles, Discharge of Contract, Breach of Contract, Implied Terms, Restitution, Unjust Enrichment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Geoghegan
Plaintiff
Stankovich
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What was the true scheme of the deed?
- 2 Was the agreement subject to an implied contractual term that Mr and Mrs Stankovich take reasonable steps to secure a subdivision?
- 3 Did Mr Geoghegan 'withdraw' from the agreement pursuant to clause 8?
Ratio Decidendi
There was no sufficient basis to imply a contractual term requiring reasonable steps to obtain subdivision, given the uncertainty and lack of evidence; thus, Mr and Mrs Stankovich did not breach the deed, and Mr Geoghegan was entitled to withdraw from the agreement under clause 8 and claim repayment of mortgage sums he paid plus 20%.
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiff in part, directions given for final orders
Orders
- Mrs Stankovich submits to judgment save as to costs.
- Direction that parties prepare short minutes consistent with these reasons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment