Atkinson v Faure [2004] NSWSC 997
The plaintiff is not the registered proprietor or equitable owner of the Muswellbrook property, and all prior legal and equitable claims in respect of the property have been rejected or settled. There is no basis for the proceedings, which fall under all heads of Part 13 r 5 of the Supreme Court Rules 1970 and are therefore dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Summary Dismissal at First Instance
- Outcome
- Proceedings summarily dismissed; costs ordered on indemnity basis against plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- ['summary Disposal' 'property Ownership' 'frivolous or Vexatious Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Dismissal at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiff has any legal or equitable interest in the Muswellbrook property' 'Whether the proceedings are frivolous, vexatious or an abuse of process']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff is not the registered proprietor or equitable owner of the Muswellbrook property, and all prior legal and equitable claims in respect of the property have been rejected or settled. There is no basis for the proceedings, which fall under all heads of Part 13 r 5 of the Supreme Court Rules 1970 and are therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Proceedings summarily dismissed; costs ordered on indemnity basis against plaintiff.
Orders
- ["Plaintiff's notice of motion of 14 September 2004 dismissed." 'Proceedings dismissed.' "Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings on the indemnity basis."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment