Ramsay v Trustees Executors & Agency Co Ltd [1948] HCA 44
The majority (Latham C.J., Starke, McTiernan, Williams JJ.) held that the testamentary provision, although excluding the son's wife, did not generally present a substantial or real temptation to terminate matrimonial relations contrary to public policy; thus, the trusts were valid. The minority (Dixon, Williams JJ.) considered the gift over as void for its intrinsic tendency to encourage dissolution of marriage, thus contrary to public policy.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['testamentary Disposition' 'validity of Conditional Gifts' 'public Policy and Marriage' 'gift Over Provisions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Is a testamentary provision that encourages termination of marriage through divorce contrary to public policy?' "Is a gift over, conditional upon the testator's son predeceasing his wife, void as an inducement for divorce?"]
Ratio Decidendi
The majority (Latham C.J., Starke, McTiernan, Williams JJ.) held that the testamentary provision, although excluding the son's wife, did not generally present a substantial or real temptation to terminate matrimonial relations contrary to public policy; thus, the trusts were valid. The minority (Dixon, Williams JJ.) considered the gift over as void for its intrinsic tendency to encourage dissolution of marriage, thus contrary to public policy.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment