Re George Chistopher Pini [1987] ATPT 2

Re George Chistopher Pini [1987] ATPT 2

Mr. Pini lacks sufficient interest under s. 101 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 to bring the application for review because he is no longer a member, plate holder, or taxi owner with RSL, and his dispute is more appropriately dealt with in the civil courts.

Parties
Applicant: George Christopher Pini; Respondent: Trade Practices Commission; Intervener: RSL Ex-Servicemens Cabs and Co-Operatives Members Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 November 1987
Procedural Posture
Application for Review / Final Decision
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Application for Review, Sufficient Interest of Applicant
Trade Practices Application for Review Sufficient Interest of Applicant

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Christopher Pini

Applicant

Trade Practices Commission

Respondent

RSL Ex-Servicemens Cabs and Co-Operatives Members Limited

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Application for Review / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Mr. Pini has a sufficient interest under s. 101 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 to bring an application for review

Ratio Decidendi

Mr. Pini lacks sufficient interest under s. 101 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 to bring the application for review because he is no longer a member, plate holder, or taxi owner with RSL, and his dispute is more appropriately dealt with in the civil courts.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application be dismissed.
  • There be no order as to costs.