McGowan v Grieve [1918] HCA 11

On the facts before the Court, the Magistrate was wrong in his finding that the statement made by the defendant was false; therefore, the conviction should be quashed.

Parties: Appellant: George Francis McGowan; Respondent: John Alexander Grieve
Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 13 March 1918
Procedural Posture: Appeal / On Appeal From the Court of Petty Sessions of Victoria
Outcome: Appeal allowed. Conviction quashed.
Legal Topics: War Precautions, False Statements, Referendum, Ultra Vires

Criminal Law Constitutional Law War Precautions False Statements Referendum Ultra Vires

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

George Francis McGowan

Appellant

John Alexander Grieve

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / On Appeal From the Court of Petty Sessions of Victoria

Legal Issues

1 Whether the appellant made a false statement of fact likely to affect the judgment of electors before the referendum under the War Precautions (Military Service Referendum) Regulations 1917.
2 Whether there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction.

Ratio Decidendi

On the facts before the Court, the Magistrate was wrong in his finding that the statement made by the defendant was false; therefore, the conviction should be quashed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed. Conviction quashed.

Orders

Order nisi absolute.
Appellant awarded costs.