Regina v George KATZ [2005] NSWCCA 128
The appeal failed because the applicant did not provide a proper basis for concluding that mental illness delayed the guilty pleas, the 15 percent discount was open to the sentencing judge, the reduction of the statutory ratio to about 70 percent after finding special circumstances was open to the judge, and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['guilty Plea Discount' 'mental Illness and Timing of Plea' 'special Circumstances' 'statutory Ratio' 'non Parole Period' 'accumulation of Sentences' 'totality']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the 15 percent discount allowed for the pleas of guilty was inadequate because mental illness impeded earlier pleas.' 'Whether, after finding special circumstances, the sentencing judge erred by varying the statutory ratio from 75 percent to 70 percent only.' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred by partially accumulating the sentences for the offences.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal failed because the applicant did not provide a proper basis for concluding that mental illness delayed the guilty pleas, the 15 percent discount was open to the sentencing judge, the reduction of the statutory ratio to about 70 percent after finding special circumstances was open to the judge, and the slight partial accumulation of sentences was justified by the overall criminality and did not offend totality.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment