Kyriacou v Raphis Securities Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 339
The court applied the principle that costs usually follow the event in interlocutory applications, with appropriate apportionment where mixed success occurred. Costs were allocated with reference to parties' success and sensible offers made, reflecting judicial discretion and effective case management considerations.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Applications for Costs / Post Interlocutory, Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Interlocutory costs orders made as specified.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'case Management' 'consolidation of Proceedings' 'leave to Amend Pleadings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Applications for Costs / Post Interlocutory, Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether costs should follow the event in interlocutory applications' 'Appropriate apportionment of costs between parties' 'Whether specific offers should affect costs orders']
Ratio Decidendi
The court applied the principle that costs usually follow the event in interlocutory applications, with appropriate apportionment where mixed success occurred. Costs were allocated with reference to parties' success and sensible offers made, reflecting judicial discretion and effective case management considerations.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory costs orders made as specified.
Orders
- ["First and second respondents to the amended notice of motion dated 25 January 2022 to pay 25% of plaintiffs' costs in the Raphis Proceeding for the consolidation motion on the ordinary basis." 'Plaintiffs in the Raphis Proceeding to pay the costs of the ninth and tenth respondents for the amendment motion, limited...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment