Woodward v Woodward [2013] NSWSC 1664
Although the plaintiff's evidence was sketchy and did not establish a strong prima facie case, it was sufficient to show that the plaintiff, as creator and funder of the trust, may well have standing to complain about its administration, particularly where the trustee had declined to provide the trust instrument. Evidence of threats by the first defendant to remove trust assets from Australia raised serious issues about the suitability of the second defendant, controlled by the first defendant, to remain trustee. Because a short restraint would preserve the status quo and no inconvenience was identified, the balance of convenience favoured granting interlocutory relief on the usual...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Division Proceedings by Summons Concerning the Woodward Family Trust / Interlocutory Application for Injunction/freezing Orders
- Outcome
- Interlocutory injunction granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Injunctions' 'freezing Orders' 'trust Administration' 'threatened Removal of Trust Assets From Australia' 'balance of Convenience' 'standing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Division Proceedings by Summons Concerning the Woodward Family Trust / Interlocutory Application for Injunction/freezing Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the plaintiff had shown sufficient standing and a sufficient likelihood of ultimate success to justify interlocutory relief concerning the trust assets.' 'Whether threats to remove trust assets from Australia justified preserving the status quo pending further hearing.' 'Whether delay by the plaintiff and the absence of the trust deed should prevent interlocutory relief.' 'Whether the balance of convenience favoured restraining operation of the trust bank accounts and removal of trust assets from Australia.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the plaintiff's evidence was sketchy and did not establish a strong prima facie case, it was sufficient to show that the plaintiff, as creator and funder of the trust, may well have standing to complain about its administration, particularly where the trustee had declined to provide the trust instrument. Evidence of threats by the first defendant to remove trust assets from Australia raised serious issues about the suitability of the second defendant, controlled by the first defendant, to remain trustee. Because a short restraint would preserve the status quo and no inconvenience was identified, the balance of convenience favoured granting interlocutory relief on the usual...
Court Disposition
Interlocutory injunction granted.
Orders
- ['For the period up to and including 3 December 2013, the first and second defendants be restrained, and in the case of the second defendant by itself, its employees or agents, from operating any bank account of the Woodward Family Trust other than by depositing monies into such account.' 'For the period up to and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment