Mihnyak, G & Anor v Campbell, Mark & Anor [1997] FCA 181
No arguable error is shown in the judgment of Davies J regarding breach of s 42 Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) or the damages assessment, and no 'special reasons' warranting extension of time to appeal exist; both motions are dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Motions / Post Judgment; Applications for Extension of Time to Appeal and Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- Both motions dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time to Appeal' 'stay of Execution' 'misrepresentation' 'damages' 'fair Trading Act 1987 (nsw)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Motions / Post Judgment; Applications for Extension of Time to Appeal and Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether 'special reasons' exist for extension of time to appeal under Order 52 sub-rule 15(2)" 'Whether a stay of execution should be granted pending appeal' 'Whether there is an arguable error in finding breach of s 42 Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW)' 'Whether there is an arguable error in assessment of damages']
Ratio Decidendi
No arguable error is shown in the judgment of Davies J regarding breach of s 42 Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) or the damages assessment, and no 'special reasons' warranting extension of time to appeal exist; both motions are dismissed.
Court Disposition
Both motions dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Motion for leave to file and serve notice of appeal out of time dismissed with costs.' 'Motion for stay of execution of orders made by Davies J on 19 December 1996 dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment