George Pegios v Simon Rez – [Costs] [2022] NSWSC 915
The Calderbank offer did not support indemnity costs because it did not offer a true compromise but only a paltry amount, acceptance would have been tantamount to capitulation by George, George's own costs likely significantly exceeded $1,000 by the time of the offer, and it was not unreasonable for George not to accept it.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Costs / On the Papers After Principal Proceedings
- Outcome
- Plaintiff to pay defendants' costs on the ordinary basis.
- Legal Topics
- ['calderbank Letter' 'indemnity Costs' 'ordinary Basis Costs' 'offer of Compromise']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs / On the Papers After Principal Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Calderbank letter dated 16 March 2022 supported an order that George Pegios pay the defendants' costs on an indemnity basis." 'Whether it was unreasonable for George Pegios not to accept the Calderbank offer.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Calderbank offer did not support indemnity costs because it did not offer a true compromise but only a paltry amount, acceptance would have been tantamount to capitulation by George, George's own costs likely significantly exceeded $1,000 by the time of the offer, and it was not unreasonable for George not to accept it.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff to pay defendants' costs on the ordinary basis.
Orders
- ["George Pegios is to pay Simon Rez's and Reka Consultants Pty Limited's costs of the proceedings on the ordinary basis."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment