Thomson And The Land Agents Act, 1927 [1988] NSWLEC 150
The applicant bore the onus of satisfying the Court that he was of good fame and character and had the fitness and competence required to be accredited as worthy of public confidence in performing land agent functions. Although the Court was disinclined to reject the application on good fame and character, the applicant had minimal unsupervised conveyancing experience, no practical experience in Crown lands matters, only recent and perfunctory study, little understanding of the lawful scope and duties of a land agent, and proposed to learn through work obtained after registration. He therefore lacked the qualifications and experience necessary for registration.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 December 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Registration as a Land Agent Under the Land Agents Act, 1927 / Determination of Contested Application
- Outcome
- Application refused; applicant ordered to pay the Law Society of New South Wales's costs as objector.
- Legal Topics
- ['registration of Land Agents' 'good Fame and Character' 'fitness and Competence' 'scope of Land Agent Work' 'unauthorised Legal Work']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Registration as a Land Agent Under the Land Agents Act, 1927 / Determination of Contested Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant satisfied the Court as to his good fame and character under the Land Agents Act, 1927.' 'Whether the applicant had the fitness and competence required to perform the duties and functions of a land agent.' 'Whether registration as a land agent would permit the applicant to undertake work under the Conveyancing Act, 1919 and Real Property Act, 1900 notwithstanding prohibitions in the Legal Profession Act, 1987.']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant bore the onus of satisfying the Court that he was of good fame and character and had the fitness and competence required to be accredited as worthy of public confidence in performing land agent functions. Although the Court was disinclined to reject the application on good fame and character, the applicant had minimal unsupervised conveyancing experience, no practical experience in Crown lands matters, only recent and perfunctory study, little understanding of the lawful scope and duties of a land agent, and proposed to learn through work obtained after registration. He therefore lacked the qualifications and experience necessary for registration.
Court Disposition
Application refused; applicant ordered to pay the Law Society of New South Wales's costs as objector.
Orders
- ['The application be refused.' 'The applicant pay the costs of the Law Society of New South Wales as objector.' 'Exhibits may be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment