Hanania v Parramatta Wholesale Cars Pty Ltd (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 1952

The application for adjournment was granted on the balance of discretionary considerations, including the imminent resumption of live hearings, inherent difficulties with remote hearings (especially given interpreter issues and recent change of solicitor), and the interests of justice allowing the plaintiffs to...

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Plaintiff: George Shukri Hanania; Plaintiff: Raymond Hanania; Defendant: Issa Hanania; Fifth Cross Defendant: Elias Hanania
Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 19 May 2020
Procedural Posture: Civil / Application for Adjournment (procedural Ruling)
Outcome: Application for adjournment granted
Legal Topics: Adjournment, Remote Hearings, COVID 19 Impact, Hearing in Person, Court Discretion

Civil Procedure Adjournment Remote Hearings COVID 19 Impact Hearing in Person Court Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

George Shukri Hanania

Plaintiff

Raymond Hanania

Plaintiff

Issa Hanania

Defendant

Elias Hanania

Fifth Cross Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application for Adjournment (procedural Ruling)

Legal Issues

1 Whether to grant an adjournment to allow the hearing to be conducted in person rather than remotely

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application for adjournment granted

Orders

The further hearing of the proceedings which was to commence next Monday is adjourned.
Fix the matter for further hearing with an estimate of five days commencing on Monday, 26 October 2020.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.