Shaw v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [1999] NSWSC 258
Because the plaintiff did not appear when called, after having been present when the matter was stood over, and did not participate further after an adjournment was refused, the appropriate order was judgment for the defendants on the plaintiff's claim under SCR Pt 34 r 5. Although the first defendant's indemnity costs application had force, the Court did not accede to it and awarded both defendants ordinary costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Proceeding / Hearing; Judgment After Plaintiff Did Not Appear
- Outcome
- Judgment entered for defendants.
- Legal Topics
- ['supreme Court Practice' 'judgments and Orders' 'non Appearance by Plaintiff' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceeding / Hearing; Judgment After Plaintiff Did Not Appear
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What order should be made where the plaintiff commenced to prosecute the claim at the hearing but absented himself during its course.' 'Whether the first defendant should receive costs on an indemnity basis.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the plaintiff did not appear when called, after having been present when the matter was stood over, and did not participate further after an adjournment was refused, the appropriate order was judgment for the defendants on the plaintiff's claim under SCR Pt 34 r 5. Although the first defendant's indemnity costs application had force, the Court did not accede to it and awarded both defendants ordinary costs.
Court Disposition
Judgment entered for defendants.
Orders
- ["Judgment for the defendants on the plaintiff's claim." "The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment