Voustinellos v Beveridge [1999] FCA 1113

Voustinellos v Beveridge [1999] FCA 1113

Because the matter involved an important question concerning the administration of the taxation office and an important question concerning the applicant's fundamental right to a fair trial, the appropriate order was that there be no order as to costs; the Commissioner of Taxation's request for costs was refused.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 August 1999
Procedural Posture
Administrative Law; Costs Application Arising Out of a Criminal Committal Proceeding / Ex Tempore Reasons After Consent Resolution; Determination of the Commissioner of Taxation's Application for Costs
Outcome
Commissioner of Taxation's application for costs refused; no order as to costs.
Legal Topics
['costs Discretion' 'production of Records' 'disclosure Restrictions on Taxation Information' 'right to a Fair Trial' 'unauthorised Access to Taxation Office Computer']
['administrative Law' 'costs' 'criminal Procedure' 'taxation'] ['costs Discretion' 'production of Records' 'disclosure Restrictions on Taxation Information' 'right to a Fair Trial' 'unauthorised Access to Taxation Office Computer']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Administrative Law; Costs Application Arising Out of a Criminal Committal Proceeding / Ex Tempore Reasons After Consent Resolution; Determination of the Commissioner of Taxation's Application for Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Commissioner of Taxation should receive an order for costs after the Federal Court application was resolved by consent.' "Whether the circumstances involved an important question about the administration of the taxation office and the applicant's fundamental right to a fair trial."]

Ratio Decidendi

Because the matter involved an important question concerning the administration of the taxation office and an important question concerning the applicant's fundamental right to a fair trial, the appropriate order was that there be no order as to costs; the Commissioner of Taxation's request for costs was refused.

Court Disposition

Commissioner of Taxation's application for costs refused; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • ['The order contained in the short minutes was made.' 'No order as to costs.']