Georges River Council v Emanuel Mifsud [2020] NSWLEC 149
The Council proved, on evidence, that the premises were unsightly, unsafe and unhealthy in breach of s 124 of the Local Government Act 1993 and that the First Respondent failed to comply with a valid order. The Court therefore granted orders enabling the Council to remedy the breach after a 28-day grace period.
- Parties
- Applicant: Georges River Council; First Respondent: Emanuel Mifsud; Second Respondent: Crystina Mifsud
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 / Principal Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Orders made for council to enter premises and remedy breach after a 28-day suspension; First Respondent to pay council’s costs (with noted exclusions).
- Legal Topics
- Failure to Comply With Local Government Order, Premises in Unsafe or Unsightly Condition, Enforcement Powers of Local Council, Remedies for Breach of Local Government Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Georges River Council
Applicant
Emanuel Mifsud
First Respondent
Crystina Mifsud
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 4 / Principal Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First Respondent failed to comply with an order issued under s 124 of the Local Government Act 1993
- 2 Whether the premises were in an unsafe, unhealthy, or unsightly condition
- 3 Whether the Council is entitled to enter the premises and do all works necessary to give effect to the order
Ratio Decidendi
The Council proved, on evidence, that the premises were unsightly, unsafe and unhealthy in breach of s 124 of the Local Government Act 1993 and that the First Respondent failed to comply with a valid order. The Court therefore granted orders enabling the Council to remedy the breach after a 28-day grace period.
Court Disposition
Orders made for council to enter premises and remedy breach after a 28-day suspension; First Respondent to pay council’s costs (with noted exclusions).
Orders
- Declaration that the First Respondent failed to comply with the Order dated 28 October 2019.
- The Council is empowered to do all things necessary or convenient to give effect to the Order after a 28-day deferral.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment