Griffin v Wilson [1935] HCA 16
Since s. 5(3) does not apply to offences under s. 7 of the Immigration Act 1901-1933, and there was insufficient evidence of the necessary elements of the s. 7 offence, the conviction cannot stand and must be quashed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Gerald Griffin; Respondents: Richard William Wilson and Another
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Removal of Cause (criminal/immigration) / Appeal by Way of Case Stated From Supreme Court of New South Wales; Hearing of Question in High Court After Removal Under Sec. 40 Judiciary Act
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed
- Legal Topics
- Dictation Test, Burden of Proof, Averments in Information, Interpretation of Immigration Act Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gerald Griffin
Applicant
Richard William Wilson and Another
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Application for Removal of Cause (criminal/immigration) / Appeal by Way of Case Stated From Supreme Court of New South Wales; Hearing of Question in High Court After Removal Under Sec. 40 Judiciary Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Do the evidentiary (averment) provisions of s. 5(3) Immigration Act 1901-1933 apply to prosecutions under s. 7 of the Act?
- 2 Was there evidence to establish the elements of the offence under s. 7?
- 3 Does failure to pass the dictation test, without opportunity to voluntarily leave, support conviction and imprisonment under the Act's powers?
Ratio Decidendi
Since s. 5(3) does not apply to offences under s. 7 of the Immigration Act 1901-1933, and there was insufficient evidence of the necessary elements of the s. 7 offence, the conviction cannot stand and must be quashed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed
Orders
- Conviction quashed
- Respondent to pay the costs of applicant in this Court and the Courts below
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment