Koutchavlis v Valuer General [2007] NSWLEC 102
The applicant did not provide valuation evidence or seriously challenge the respondent's expert conclusions. The critical comparable sales, particularly the sale of the site and Sales 9 and 10, supported the respondent's valuation, and the applicant failed to discharge the onus of proving that the valuation should be overturned.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Unimproved Land Value Assessed by the Valuer General for Rating Purposes / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['unimproved Land Value' 'comparable Sales' 'onus of Proof on Valuation Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Unimproved Land Value Assessed by the Valuer General for Rating Purposes / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the unimproved land value assessed for Lot 9 in DP 9860, 69 Griffiths Street, Balgowlah should be overturned.' "Whether the respondent's valuation evidence based on comparable sales supported a land value of $700,000."]
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant did not provide valuation evidence or seriously challenge the respondent's expert conclusions. The critical comparable sales, particularly the sale of the site and Sales 9 and 10, supported the respondent's valuation, and the applicant failed to discharge the onus of proving that the valuation should be overturned.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'The land value of Lot 9 in DP 9860, 69 Griffiths Street, Balgowlah at Base Date of 1 July 2005 is $700,000.' 'The exhibits are returned with the exception of exhibit E.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment