Koutchavlis v Valuer General [2007] NSWLEC 102

Koutchavlis v Valuer General [2007] NSWLEC 102

The applicant did not provide valuation evidence or seriously challenge the respondent's expert conclusions. The critical comparable sales, particularly the sale of the site and Sales 9 and 10, supported the respondent's valuation, and the applicant failed to discharge the onus of proving that the valuation should be overturned.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 March 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Unimproved Land Value Assessed by the Valuer General for Rating Purposes / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['unimproved Land Value' 'comparable Sales' 'onus of Proof on Valuation Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal Against Unimproved Land Value Assessed by the Valuer General for Rating Purposes / Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether the unimproved land value assessed for Lot 9 in DP 9860, 69 Griffiths Street, Balgowlah should be overturned.' "Whether the respondent's valuation evidence based on comparable sales supported a land value of $700,000."]

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant did not provide valuation evidence or seriously challenge the respondent's expert conclusions. The critical comparable sales, particularly the sale of the site and Sales 9 and 10, supported the respondent's valuation, and the applicant failed to discharge the onus of proving that the valuation should be overturned.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'The land value of Lot 9 in DP 9860, 69 Griffiths Street, Balgowlah at Base Date of 1 July 2005 is $700,000.' 'The exhibits are returned with the exception of exhibit E.']