McGuirk v University of New South Wales & anor [2008] NSWADTAP 74
The Tribunal refused leave to issue summonses as the proposed evidence was either protected by judicial and practitioner immunities, irrelevant, or insufficiently justified. The disqualification application failed because the factual premises concerning appointment and removal were incorrect, and no reasonable apprehension of bias was established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory (leave to Issue Summonses and Application for Disqualification)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Immunity' 'apprehended Bias' 'issue of Summonses' 'tribunal Member Disqualification']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory (leave to Issue Summonses and Application for Disqualification)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to issue summonses against identified individuals, including a tribunal judge.' 'Whether the Deputy President should be disqualified for apprehended bias.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal refused leave to issue summonses as the proposed evidence was either protected by judicial and practitioner immunities, irrelevant, or insufficiently justified. The disqualification application failed because the factual premises concerning appointment and removal were incorrect, and no reasonable apprehension of bias was established.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to issue summonses as sought by letter of 13 November 2008 refused in each case' 'Application for disqualification of Ms Needham SC, Deputy President, refused']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment