McGuirk v Director General, The Cabinet Office [2007] NSWADT 9
All documents in dispute are restricted documents falling within the Cabinet exemption under Clause 1 of Schedule 1 to the FOI Act. Therefore, it is not necessary for the Tribunal to consider internal working document or legal professional privilege exemptions or to consider public interest override at this stage.
- Parties
- Applicant: Gerard Michael McGuirk; Respondent: Director General, The Cabinet Office
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- External Review Under Freedom of Information Act 1989 / Interlocutory Directions Before Final Determination
- Outcome
- Matter adjourned for further directions
- Legal Topics
- Access to Documents, Cabinet Documents Exemption, Internal Working Documents, Legal Professional Privilege, Public Interest Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gerard Michael McGuirk
Applicant
Director General, The Cabinet Office
Respondent
Procedural Posture
External Review Under Freedom of Information Act 1989 / Interlocutory Directions Before Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether documents sought by the applicant are exempt as cabinet documents under Clause 1 of Schedule 1 to the FOI Act
- 2 Whether documents are exempt as internal working documents under Clause 9 of Schedule 1 to the FOI Act
- 3 Whether documents are exempt by reason of legal professional privilege under Clause 10 of Schedule 1 to the FOI Act
Ratio Decidendi
All documents in dispute are restricted documents falling within the Cabinet exemption under Clause 1 of Schedule 1 to the FOI Act. Therefore, it is not necessary for the Tribunal to consider internal working document or legal professional privilege exemptions or to consider public interest override at this stage.
Court Disposition
Matter adjourned for further directions
Orders
- The matter is to be set down for further directions on Monday, 5 February 2007 at 9.30am.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment