McGuirk v NSW Ombudsman (No 2) [2006] NSWADT 212
The matters should be remitted to the Ombudsman for reconsideration in accordance with the findings of the Tribunal's Appeal Panel in McGuirk v Independent Commissioner Against Corruption [2006] NSWADTAP 17, as both parties agree and in light of the similar legal issues presented.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Review of Administrative Decision / Remittal for Reconsideration
- Outcome
- Remitted for reconsideration
- Legal Topics
- ['access to Documents' 'statutory Exemption' 'tribunal Procedures']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Review of Administrative Decision / Remittal for Reconsideration
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether documents requested by the applicant are exempt under section 9 and Schedule 2 of the Freedom of Information Act 1989' 'Whether the Ombudsman should reconsider the application in light of the findings in McGuirk v Independent Commissioner Against Corruption [2006] NSWADTAP 17']
Ratio Decidendi
The matters should be remitted to the Ombudsman for reconsideration in accordance with the findings of the Tribunal's Appeal Panel in McGuirk v Independent Commissioner Against Corruption [2006] NSWADTAP 17, as both parties agree and in light of the similar legal issues presented.
Court Disposition
Remitted for reconsideration
Orders
- ["The matters are remitted to the Ombudsman pursuant to section 65 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 for reconsideration in a manner consistent with the findings of the Tribunal's Appeal Panel in McGuirk v Independent Commissioner Against Corruption [2006] NSWADTAP 17." 'The matters are listed for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment