McGuirk v NSW Ombudsman (No 2) [2006] NSWADT 212

McGuirk v NSW Ombudsman (No 2) [2006] NSWADT 212

The matters should be remitted to the Ombudsman for reconsideration in accordance with the findings of the Tribunal's Appeal Panel in McGuirk v Independent Commissioner Against Corruption [2006] NSWADTAP 17, as both parties agree and in light of the similar legal issues presented.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 July 2006
Procedural Posture
Review of Administrative Decision / Remittal for Reconsideration
Outcome
Remitted for reconsideration
Legal Topics
['access to Documents' 'statutory Exemption' 'tribunal Procedures']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Review of Administrative Decision / Remittal for Reconsideration

  1. 1 ['Whether documents requested by the applicant are exempt under section 9 and Schedule 2 of the Freedom of Information Act 1989' 'Whether the Ombudsman should reconsider the application in light of the findings in McGuirk v Independent Commissioner Against Corruption [2006] NSWADTAP 17']

Ratio Decidendi

The matters should be remitted to the Ombudsman for reconsideration in accordance with the findings of the Tribunal's Appeal Panel in McGuirk v Independent Commissioner Against Corruption [2006] NSWADTAP 17, as both parties agree and in light of the similar legal issues presented.

Court Disposition

Remitted for reconsideration

Orders

  • ["The matters are remitted to the Ombudsman pursuant to section 65 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 for reconsideration in a manner consistent with the findings of the Tribunal's Appeal Panel in McGuirk v Independent Commissioner Against Corruption [2006] NSWADTAP 17." 'The matters are listed for...