Gerard Michael McGuirk v The State of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 616
Leave to withdraw admissions was granted because the admissions related to matters irrelevant to the issues in the proceedings, were not properly the subject of admissions, or were matters within the knowledge of the plaintiff and ought to be proved by evidence. The defendant provided a satisfactory explanation for its delay, and the overriding purpose of civil procedure supports focusing upon genuinely disputed matters rather than admitting contentious issues by default.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Gerard Michael McGuirk; Defendant: The State of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Motion (leave to Withdraw Admissions)
- Outcome
- Leave to withdraw admissions granted.
- Legal Topics
- Notice to Admit, Deemed Admissions, Withdrawal of Admissions, Authenticity of Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gerard Michael McGuirk
Plaintiff
The State of New South Wales
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Motion (leave to Withdraw Admissions)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to the defendant to withdraw deemed admissions resulting from failure to respond to a notice to admit facts and authenticity of documents in time.
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to withdraw admissions was granted because the admissions related to matters irrelevant to the issues in the proceedings, were not properly the subject of admissions, or were matters within the knowledge of the plaintiff and ought to be proved by evidence. The defendant provided a satisfactory explanation for its delay, and the overriding purpose of civil procedure supports focusing upon genuinely disputed matters rather than admitting contentious issues by default.
Court Disposition
Leave to withdraw admissions granted.
Orders
- The defendant is granted leave to withdraw its admissions of the facts asserted in paragraphs 1 – 7, 9 – 11 and 13 – 18 of the notice to admit facts and authenticity of documents, and its admissions of authenticity of documents set out in paragraphs 20 – 49 (annexures AB – BE) and 51 – 84 (annexures BG – CM) of that...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment