Gerring Pty Ltd v Mostert, Louis Lindes & Anor Mostert, Louis Lindes & Anor v Kyle & Anor [1998] FCA 897
The Court determined that the cross-claimants are to pay the first cross-respondent's costs for hearings on 20 October 1997 and 3 November 1997, as the first cross-respondent was substantially successful. For the hearing of 16 June 1998, the first cross-respondent must pay the cross-claimant's costs, reflecting the acceptance of their submissions. Costs incurred and thrown away by the further re-amendment to the cross-claim and subsequent amendments to defences are to be the first cross-respondent's in any event.
- Parties
- Applicant: Gerring Pty Ltd (ACN 009 105 926); First Respondent: Louis Lindes Mostert; Second Respondent: Susanna Maria Mostert; Cross Claimant: Louis Lindes Mostert; Second Cross Claimant: Susanna Maria Mostert; First Cross Respondent: Peter Arthur Kyle; Second Cross Respondent: Gerring Pty Ltd (ACN 009 105 926)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Hearing Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Costs orders issued
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Cross Claim, Amendment of Pleadings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gerring Pty Ltd (ACN 009 105 926)
Applicant
Louis Lindes Mostert
First Respondent
Susanna Maria Mostert
Second Respondent
Louis Lindes Mostert
Cross Claimant
Susanna Maria Mostert
Second Cross Claimant
Peter Arthur Kyle
First Cross Respondent
Gerring Pty Ltd (ACN 009 105 926)
Second Cross Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Hearing Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Who should bear the costs of hearings held on 20 October 1997, 3 November 1997, and 16 June 1998
- 2 Consequences for costs arising from further re-amendment to the cross-claim and amendments to defences
Ratio Decidendi
The Court determined that the cross-claimants are to pay the first cross-respondent's costs for hearings on 20 October 1997 and 3 November 1997, as the first cross-respondent was substantially successful. For the hearing of 16 June 1998, the first cross-respondent must pay the cross-claimant's costs, reflecting the acceptance of their submissions. Costs incurred and thrown away by the further re-amendment to the cross-claim and subsequent amendments to defences are to be the first cross-respondent's in any event.
Court Disposition
Costs orders issued
Orders
- The cross-claimants pay the first cross-respondent's costs of 20 October 1997 and 3 November 1997 relating to the first cross-respondent's motion to dismiss or stay the cross-claim.
- Save that the first cross-respondent pay the cross-claimant's costs of the hearing of 16 June 1998 in any event, the costs incurred and thrown away by the further re- amendment to the cross-claim and the costs of any consequent amendment to the defences to cross-claim be the first cross-respondent's in any event.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment