GGE v Children’s Guardian [2024] NSWCATAD 330
GGE remains a disqualified person under the WWC Act because the conduct for which he was convicted, though the statutory offence was repealed, continues to be criminal under current law; the Tribunal was not satisfied that GGE does not pose a risk to the safety of children, as required to grant an enabling order,...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: GGE; Respondent: Children's Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Working With Children Check Clearances, Disqualifying Offences, Enabling Order Refusal, Risk to the Safety of Children, Domestic Violence Convictions, Criminal History Assessment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GGE
Applicant
Children's Guardian
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Is GGE a disqualified person under the WWC Act?
- 2 Should an enabling order be granted to GGE under s 28 of the WWC Act?
Ratio Decidendi
GGE remains a disqualified person under the WWC Act because the conduct for which he was convicted, though the statutory offence was repealed, continues to be criminal under current law; the Tribunal was not satisfied that GGE does not pose a risk to the safety of children, as required to grant an enabling order, due to his lack of insight, absence of remorse, and history of domestic violence, some in the presence of children, and failure to provide sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption of risk.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- The time for making the application is extended to 1 March 2024 pursuant to section 41 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.
- The application for an enabling order under s 28 of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW) is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment