Ghazi Al Ali Architect Pty Ltd v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2022] NSWLEC 1493
The appeal is upheld and development consent is granted because the Court is satisfied, having regard to the agreement of the parties, the jurisdictional preconditions under the relevant legislation are met, and the decision to grant consent is one that the Court could properly make.
- Parties
- Applicant: Ghazi Al Ali Architect Pty Ltd; Respondent: Canterbury-Bankstown Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 (development Appeal) / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted
- Legal Topics
- Development Consent, Appeal, Conciliation Conference, Community Facility, Place of Public Worship
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ghazi Al Ali Architect Pty Ltd
Applicant
Canterbury-Bankstown Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 (development Appeal) / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether development consent should be granted for alterations and additions to a community facility and construction of a mixed-use development including a place of public worship, food and drink premises, and basement car parking
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld and development consent is granted because the Court is satisfied, having regard to the agreement of the parties, the jurisdictional preconditions under the relevant legislation are met, and the decision to grant consent is one that the Court could properly make.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to rely upon the updated Plan of Management dated 30 August 2022.
- The appeal is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment