Romolo v R [2018] NSWCCA 3
The evidence was not capable of proving beyond reasonable doubt that the applicant and Hamzy agreed to commit the offence as particularised; there was a reasonable possibility that both acted under instructions from third parties without communicating with each other. The conviction should be quashed, and an acquittal entered as a new trial would require substantial amendment to the indictment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; acquittal entered; applicant released from custody
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Conviction' 'joint Criminal Enterprise' 'drug Importation' 'unreasonable Verdict']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the verdict was unreasonable or cannot be supported by the evidence' 'Whether the prosecution proved the existence of an agreement between the applicant and the alleged co-offender' 'Whether a retrial is appropriate']
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence was not capable of proving beyond reasonable doubt that the applicant and Hamzy agreed to commit the offence as particularised; there was a reasonable possibility that both acted under instructions from third parties without communicating with each other. The conviction should be quashed, and an acquittal entered as a new trial would require substantial amendment to the indictment.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; acquittal entered; applicant released from custody
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal' 'Allow the appeal' "Quash the applicant's conviction of the offence charged in the indictment filed in relation to him on 21 July 2016" 'Direct a judgment and verdict of acquittal on that charge' 'Direct that the applicant be released from custody forthwith']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment