Regina v Gilbert Adam [1999] NSWCCA 197
The appeal was dismissed as the verdict was open to the jury on the evidence, and the trial judge did not err in failing to discharge the jury or in admitting prior inconsistent statements under ss60 and 66 of the Evidence Act 1995, given their relevance and the effectiveness of judicial directions to address any...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'unsafe and Unsatisfactory Verdict' 'appeal Against Conviction' 'jury Discharge' 'hearsay Exception' 'admissibility of Previous Representation' 'acting in Concert' 'consciousness of Guilt']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the jury's verdict was unsafe and unsatisfactory" 'Whether the trial judge erred in not discharging the jury after prejudicial material was found in the jury room' 'Whether the trial judge erred in admitting the evidence of the witness Thaier Sako, including his prior statements']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed as the verdict was open to the jury on the evidence, and the trial judge did not err in failing to discharge the jury or in admitting prior inconsistent statements under ss60 and 66 of the Evidence Act 1995, given their relevance and the effectiveness of judicial directions to address any prejudice.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence refused.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment