Gedeon v Crime Commission of NSW [2006] NSWLC 21

Gedeon v Crime Commission of NSW [2006] NSWLC 21

Given Mr Bradley's direct and significant involvement in operational decision-making and investigative processes relevant to the alleged impropriety and illegality, and the defence's legitimate forensic purpose in examining these issues, the subpoena is not an abuse of process and should not be set aside. Mr Bradley may give relevant evidence distinct from the matters covered by evidentiary certificates or the authority itself. The balance favours permitting his cross-examination in the defence case at committal.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Committal Proceedings (interlocutory Decision on Subpoena)
Outcome
Subpoena not set aside; Mr Bradley to attend and give evidence.
Legal Topics
['subpoena' 'committal Proceedings' 'controlled Operations' 'illegally Obtained Evidence']
['criminal Law'] ['subpoena' 'committal Proceedings' 'controlled Operations' 'illegally Obtained Evidence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Committal Proceedings (interlocutory Decision on Subpoena)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the subpoena issued to Mr Bradley, Commissioner of the NSW Crime Commission, should be set aside in committal proceedings involving alleged impropriety and illegality in obtaining evidence during a controlled operation']

Ratio Decidendi

Given Mr Bradley's direct and significant involvement in operational decision-making and investigative processes relevant to the alleged impropriety and illegality, and the defence's legitimate forensic purpose in examining these issues, the subpoena is not an abuse of process and should not be set aside. Mr Bradley may give relevant evidence distinct from the matters covered by evidentiary certificates or the authority itself. The balance favours permitting his cross-examination in the defence case at committal.

Court Disposition

Subpoena not set aside; Mr Bradley to attend and give evidence.

Orders

  • ['The subpoena is not set aside.']