GILMORE v COSTAIN AUSTRALIA LTD [1988] NSWCA 49
The trial judge was in error in withdrawing from the jury the issue of negligence relating to the failure to carry out regular monitoring audiometry and in excluding expert evidence as to the adequacy of ear plug instructions and the effectiveness of their application; a new trial is required to allow these issues to be considered by a jury.
- Parties
- Appellant: Gilmore; Respondent: Costain Australia Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Jury Verdict
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; new trial ordered
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Employer's Duty of Care, Occupational Safety, Admissibility of Expert Evidence, Audiometric Monitoring, Hearing Loss
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gilmore
Appellant
Costain Australia Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Jury Verdict
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in withdrawing a ground of negligence (failing to carry out or regularly carry out monitoring audiometry) from the jury
- 2 Whether expert evidence regarding adequacy of ear plug instructions and method of use was wrongfully excluded
- 3 Whether the verdict was unreasonable or perverse
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge was in error in withdrawing from the jury the issue of negligence relating to the failure to carry out regular monitoring audiometry and in excluding expert evidence as to the adequacy of ear plug instructions and the effectiveness of their application; a new trial is required to allow these issues to be considered by a jury.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; new trial ordered
Orders
- Order that the judgment and costs order below be set aside
- Order that a new trial be ordered on all issues
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment