Gina Koh v Ja Kil Ku [2009] NSWDC 264
The costs cap in s 338(1)(a) of the Legal Profession Act 2004 does not apply to personal injury damages awarded outside the operation of the Civil Liability Act 2002, such as for intentional torts excluded by s 3B. Therefore, the plaintiff's recoverable costs are not limited by that section.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment Application on Costs
- Outcome
- Application determined in favour of the plaintiff; costs not limited by s 338(1)(a)
- Legal Topics
- ['costs in Personal Injury Damages' 'intentional Torts and Costs' 'interpretation of Legal Profession Act 2004 S 338(1)(a)']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment Application on Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether s 338(1)(a) of the Legal Profession Act 2004 fixes the maximum costs recoverable for legal services in personal injury damages claims arising from intentional torts, where damages are awarded outside the operation of the Civil Liability Act 2002']
Ratio Decidendi
The costs cap in s 338(1)(a) of the Legal Profession Act 2004 does not apply to personal injury damages awarded outside the operation of the Civil Liability Act 2002, such as for intentional torts excluded by s 3B. Therefore, the plaintiff's recoverable costs are not limited by that section.
Court Disposition
Application determined in favour of the plaintiff; costs not limited by s 338(1)(a)
Orders
- ['The costs recoverable by the plaintiff are not limited to those allowed by s 338(1)(a) of the Legal Profession Act 2004']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment