GIO Building Society [2001] NSWSC 704

GIO Building Society [2001] NSWSC 704

The Court does not decide the substantive valuation issues or appropriateness of value allocation at the first hearing but is satisfied that the plaintiff’s materials are not obviously erroneous and meet the threshold to convene member meetings. The issues of valuation and allocation of special value may be contested at the approval stage.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 August 2001
Procedural Posture
Scheme of Arrangement Application / First Court Hearing for Orders to Convene Meetings
Outcome
Orders made to convene meetings to consider proposed scheme.
Legal Topics
['scheme of Arrangement' 'demutualisation' 'valuation of Membership Rights' 'allocation of Special Value']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Scheme of Arrangement Application / First Court Hearing for Orders to Convene Meetings

  1. 1 ["Court's role at first hearing in scheme of arrangement applications" "Principles for valuation of non-shareholder members' interests" 'Approach to allocation of special value in demutualisation or analogous process']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court does not decide the substantive valuation issues or appropriateness of value allocation at the first hearing but is satisfied that the plaintiff’s materials are not obviously erroneous and meet the threshold to convene member meetings. The issues of valuation and allocation of special value may be contested at the approval stage.

Court Disposition

Orders made to convene meetings to consider proposed scheme.

Orders

  • ['Meetings of the two classes of members (non-shareholder members and shareholder member) to be convened to consider the proposed scheme of arrangement.']