GIO Workers Compensation (NSW) Ltd, In the matter of Barron, v Barron [1999] FCA 1739
Because the debtor had paid the amount claimed in the creditor's petition and all creditors were notified with no credible objection, and with the trustee's consent, it was appropriate to annul the sequestration order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Annulment Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Sequestration (bankruptcy) order annulled.
- Legal Topics
- ['annulment of Sequestration Order' 'bankruptcy Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Annulment Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sequestration order made against Leslie Raymond Barron should be annulled']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the debtor had paid the amount claimed in the creditor's petition and all creditors were notified with no credible objection, and with the trustee's consent, it was appropriate to annul the sequestration order.
Court Disposition
Sequestration (bankruptcy) order annulled.
Orders
- ['Bankruptcy of Leslie Raymond Barron pursuant to the sequestration order of 13 October 1999 annulled.' "Leslie Raymond Barron to pay the applicant's costs of $3,379.00 within 21 days." 'Leslie Raymond Barron to pay the costs of the Trustee in Bankruptcy, Giles Woodgate, up to $2,000.00 within 28 days.' 'Compliance...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment