Giorgianni v The Queen [1985] HCA 29
Knowledge of the essential facts is required for conviction as a secondary party under s. 351 for strict liability offences, and mere recklessness or negligence is insufficient; the applicant's conviction was unsafe because the jury was not properly directed on this requirement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Special Leave to Appeal and Appeal From Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside; new trial ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['criminal Complicity' 'accessorial Liability' 'culpable Driving' 'knowledge Requirement' 'strict Liability Offences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Special Leave to Appeal and Appeal From Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Can a person who aids, abets, counsels or procures culpable driving be convicted under s. 52A of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)?' 'Is knowledge of the essential facts necessary for conviction as a secondary party for a strict liability offence?' 'Is recklessness or negligence sufficient for conviction as a secondary party?']
Ratio Decidendi
Knowledge of the essential facts is required for conviction as a secondary party under s. 351 for strict liability offences, and mere recklessness or negligence is insufficient; the applicant's conviction was unsafe because the jury was not properly directed on this requirement.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside; new trial ordered.
Orders
- ['Judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal set aside.' 'Appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeal allowed.' 'Conviction and sentence set aside.' 'New trial ordered.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment